Hi
Could someone please inform me why no both parties no longer have to agree to a war to make it legit. these current rules seem to allow for bashing of players as long as the basher or basher alliance say they're going to do it first. this seems counter-logical as if i said i was going to kick someone in the face and then did it the police would not be ok with it, just because i told them first. as bashing is against the rules can someone please explain to me the logic behind this decision, preferably someone who knows the logic behind the decision. i played 8 years ago, before the implementation of this new war rule and wars ran smoothly. a war did not signify the end of playing for one party or the other or their alliance , just a bit of fun.
Thanks
HappyTimez.
Why have the Rules for wars been changed?
-
- Game
- EN/ORG
- HappyTimez
-
Well the rules where changed to help prevent alliances from just declaring war to get the bashing rule lifted. also as far back as i remember neither side had to agree to a war declaration. for the war to be valid as of 5 years ago. now when you declare war you have to list all players involved from both allys and their points for each player.
-
I can't remember ever where each side had to agree with a war. If a country declares a war do they stop to ask the people they are attacking if they want to fight?
-
I remember when RAWK Declared war on everyone so they could bash whoever they wanted
was kinda fun back then -
Rav3n
Moved the thread from forum Help & Questions to forum Help & Questions (archive).
