Do you agree with this request and would you like it to be relayed to GameForge ? 32
-
Yes (4) 13%
-
No (28) 88%
Change the metal bonus production to be derived from planet size instead of position
Metal position bonus change
- Rafiki
- Closed
-
Hello Rafiki,
So that I can put your idea to the vote, could you give me a little more detail ? The figures you imagine for each planet size etc...
Thank you,
KaZe
-
The positions with most fields are 7-8-9 so this makes your suggestion pointless.
-
Fields Planet size Bonus 200 14142 0 % 210 14491 0 % 220 14832 0 % 230 15166 3 % 240 15492 10 % 250 15811 16 % 260 16125 22 % 270 16432 29 % 280 16733 35 % 290 17029 41 % 300 17321 46 % 310 17607 52 % 320 17889 58 % 330 18166 63 % 340 18439 69 % 350 18708 74 % 360 18974 79 % 370 19235 85 % bonus formula (Planet size-15000)/50 Something like this i guess. basically you get incentivized to colonize aboive size 230. which technically also includes position 5, instead of only positions 6-10. and the higher the better.
the above 250 is if someone uses the 10% or 5% bonus to planet sizes from class or alliance.
Note universe field bonus does not figure into this at all, since its just added to the field calculation after. nor does anything from terraformers or field boosters
this is crazy. The numbers need to be adjusted but I’m otherwise with you. There’s no need for an 85% bonus for metal. I’d argue 30% is too much. There are many ways to get larger planets between disco, alliance class and now lifeforms.
Overall I do like the idea as everybody is able to achieve this. Even for us big point folks who would gladly sacrifice a little DM and a well established planet if it meant making significantly more resources at the end of the day.
My suggestion would be to have 30-35% be at the top end of the range.
-
The bigest planets getting the bigest bonus is the wrong way around. You should either get lots of metal, or lots of fields.
-
What happens if you relocate to 15th position? New meta? A bit overpowered...
-
Does you bonus increase if you use terraformer? Or an item? So you can build a higher bonus.
Pass.
Sorry see the comment about booster and such. So this is irrevelant.
But still pass.
-
Hello,
I've just added a poll, so you've got 1 month to vote.
-
Ah yes, even more incentives to spend DM, because you can get planet size AND metal boost AND move to 15 to have deut boost while keeping the metal boost... Christ.
-
The bigest planets getting the bigest bonus is the wrong way around. You should either get lots of metal, or lots of fields.
the biggest planets are currently position 8 and you already get the biggest bonus there. So i dont understand your argument
this is crazy. The numbers need to be adjusted but I’m otherwise with you. There’s no need for an 85% bonus for metal. I’d argue 30% is too much. There are many ways to get larger planets between disco, alliance class and now lifeforms.
Overall I do like the idea as everybody is able to achieve this. Even for us big point folks who would gladly sacrifice a little DM and a well established planet if it meant making significantly more resources at the end of the day.
My suggestion would be to have 30-35% be at the top end of the range.
as far as i know, about 363 fields is about the max people can get vanilla. thats with 10% disco and 5% from alliance, along with another 5% from lifeforms(aka 50% disco enhancement). And getting the max sized position 8 planet. And i agree the percentage could be tweaked, i just threw out a number and formula. I think 35% should still be rewarded for a large planet or maybe a bit better. no more than 50% at the biggest.
-
Hello,
The usual reminder: one week left to vote ! : D -
Hello,
Yes: 13%
No: 88%
Suggestion rejected by the community
-
Neotinea
Closed the thread. -
Neotinea
Moved the thread from forum Feedback & Suggestions to forum Suggestions rejected.
