Moons – The Theory of Space Oddity 6969km

  • Mond6969-3.png

    Introduction

    As everyone probably knows, a moon is created in battle. It is either a consolation prize for a player—a sort of impulse to better understand the fleet save mechanics—or, as is much more common, the result of a well-planned and calculated action: moonmaking.


    The most important parameters of a moon are its diameter and the probability of its formation. The temperature parameter has no practical application in the game.

    1. The diameter and chance of a moon appearing are related to the amount of debris created as a result of the battle. For a moon to form, a minimum of 100,000 units of debris is required, while values above 2,000,000 do not affect the moon's parameters.
    2. A larger moon diameter means it is harder to destroy using a Death Star. Typically, players aim to maximize this parameter.
    3. The probability of a moon forming consists of the base debris chance pz (ranging from 1% to 20%), the effect of lunar quantum gravity pq (which increases the chance by +0% to +3% depending on the phase of Earth's moon, where a new moon = +0%), and bonus days pb (which increase the base chance by +5% or +10% on special occasions like OGame's birthday, or by +20% during a moon event).

    Theory

    Probability of Creation

    The percentage from battle p0 is the unrounded base probability of moon formation from debris z, given by the formula:

    p0 = min(z/100000, 20)/100


    The probability of a moon forming p depends on the rounded debris percentage pz = ⌊100·p0⌋/100, the effect of lunar phases pq ∈ {0%, 1%, 2%, 3%}, bonus days pb ∈ {0%, 5%, 10%, 20%}, and additional probability from the Kaelesh Supra-Refractor building PF12K.

    p = pz + pq + pb + 0.005·PF12K

    Diameter

    The moon's diameter is related to the battle percentage p0 ≥ 1% and a random number X ∈ {0, 1, 2,…, 10} with a uniform probability distribution, given by the formula:


    d = (1000·sqrt(10+X+300·p0)) (1+0.005·PF12K)


    Conclusions: For the same amount of debris z, 11 different moon diameters can be obtained, each equally probable. Assuming no Supra-Refractor (PF12K = 0), these diameters typically range from 3605 km to 8944 km, differing by 1 km. By adjusting the debris amount, any diameter within this range can be obtained, such as 6969 km, provided the fleet composition and debris on the universe allow it. With the Supra-Refractor bonus included, the maximum diameter reaches 9400 km.

    Lunar Quantum Gravity


    If you want to make smallest moons when chance is 1%-during the full moon time, you have 4% chance of success. But is better to wait for event max 40% or special date with max 30% chance. Why to do that? Small moons are easy to destroy and good to hunt the "blind wolves". Anyway during full moon only meanly 25 tries are needed, when new moon it is 100. Have Max Moon Chances Increased?


    11089-dermond-png

    Hidden Trophy

    To test the presented theory firsthand, one may attempt to unlock the hidden trophy – "Space Oddity". The task involves obtaining a moon with an exact diameter of 6969 km.


    Space-Oddity.png

    History

    A brief history of my discovery… I would like to begin by stating that, initially, I wasn’t particularly interested in achievements. I think the concept is great, but the execution leaves much to be desired. Earning the proverbial "platinum" should be feasible, but as things stand, it is currently out of reach for anyone. I felt the developers went overboard, finding yet another way to push microtransactions, which, ironically, don’t even improve your account but rather provide the illusion of satisfaction for having "wisely" invested billions of resources in five-star achievements.


    Only the limited-time seasonal skins and tasks—those that can realistically be completed to a perfect score—encouraged me to return to the game. Credit to the developers for that. And then there are these hidden achievements, rewarding the most non-intuitive yet creative approaches to gameplay. For years, I have been hunting for hidden game mechanics, statistical facts, and ways to mathematically describe and optimize them… The moon concept seemed promising, but I abandoned it after reading a guide that explicitly stated that moon diameters are discrete and could be listed in a small 20x11 table: https://owiki.de/index.php/Mond.


    Now, back to the seasonal universe. My bad moon luck continued, with over 20 failed attempts, and the accumulated losses resulted in fleet wreckage dropping to 19% instead of 20%. As a result, an unusual moon diameter appeared—one that wasn’t in the table! But how was that possible? This marks the beginning of the short history of this moon—an attempt to identify and remove an anomaly from the theory. To keep things brief, since the rest of the dots connect themselves, let’s just say that a special formation of 3131 kamikaze espionage probes perished, and with a 12% probability, a moon was created… with a very special diameter—exactly the one I was hoping for. Unlocking the trophy in the OGame category was indeed an exceptional experience, something OGame hadn’t given me in a long time, and for that, I have to thank the discoverers of the other hidden trophies.

    Calculations for the Achievement

    Mond6969km.png

    Summary

    What else can be said? Happy hunting this and other missing hidden trophies! And orginal post in Polish: https://forum.pl.ogame.gamefor…?postID=147563#post147563

    Edited once, last by holon ().

  • Very nice :)


    Only thing id say is that as much as i like "hunting" for collectibles i find them lacking since no one can "see" what title/avatar you have in a sense that everyone has it either turned off or not hoovering over nickname while in galaxy. It would be cool if title/avatar would be made visible in galaxy view in a normal sized/ogame fashioned and non intrusive way :fatgreengrin:. So what i mean is that it would be forced to be visible in case i didn't explain properly :P

    Edited 2 times, last by zajeb ().

  • Probability of Creation

    The percentage from battle p0 is the unrounded base probability of moon formation from debris z, given by the formula:

    p0 = min(z/100000, 20)/100


    The probability of a moon forming p depends on the rounded debris percentage pz = ⌊100·p0⌋/100, the effect of lunar phases pq ∈ {0%, 1%, 2%, 3%}, bonus days pb ∈ {0%, 5%, 10%, 20%}, and additional probability from the Kaelesh Supra-Refractor building PF12K.

    p = pz + pq + pb + 0.005·PF12K


    Minor correction, but the bonus from the Kaelesh Supra-Refractor building is not 0.0005 per level.

    It is either not working, or it's a multiplicative bonus, likely on the base chance (usually 20% or slightly above) to get a moon, so you'd gain 0.025 percentage point per lvl.


    I have not done extensive testing, but with a lvl 16 building I had 21% chance to get a moon, not 28 or above. (The debris field was large enough to get 20% chance for the moon).

    Control Panel -> Settings -> General -> Display members’ signatures -> NO

  • Minor correction, but the bonus from the Kaelesh Supra-Refractor building is not 0.0005 per level.


    Thanks for the info!

    Disappointing feature... I only tested the effect on the moon's diameter, so it's another useless technology, like most kaelesh.


    20%*(1+0.005*16)=20%*1.08 = 21.6%


    So we have the certainty that the probability is rounded down ⌊21.6%⌋=21%. The question is whether this is calculated from fractional p0 or from integer pz from derbis?


    For example, the fractional probability from derbis is p0=18.6%, with Kaelesh lvl 16 bonus this will give 2 options for p0=18.6% and pz=⌊18.6%⌋=18%.
    18%*1.08 = 19.44 = 19% or
    18.6%*1.08 = 20.088= 20%

    So it remains to determine whether p0 or pz should be taken into the formula. Bremm Sparkfist can you test with fewer probes (table below)? Of course, we will also have to make sure that the moon phase does not add an additional 1% to the result!


    test 8111png.png


    I will also try to test this myself and improve the formula, thank you for your attention.

    Edited once, last by holon ().

  • I conducted the mentioned tests — here is a brief description. I carried out 3 probe attempts on a universe with 40% debris:

    1. A regular test with 5000 probes to confirm that on 2025-04-28 there is a 20% chance of moon creation (new moon +0%).

    2. A test with 4214 probes on a planet without Supra-Refractor (battle percentage p₀ = 12.86%).

    3. A test with 4214 probes on a planet with a level 6 Supra-Refractor (bonus +3%).

    Results:

    1. The 20% chance of moon formation was confirmed.

    2. The probability of a moon was 12%, because ⌊12.86%⌋ = 12%.

    3. The probability of a moon was 13%, because ⌊12.86% · 1.03⌋ = ⌊13.25%⌋ = 13%.

    Final formula for the probability of moon creation, considering the Supra-Refractor:

    Probability of Creation

    The percentage from the battle p₀ is the unrounded base probability of moon formation from the amount of debris z, given by the formula:


    p₀ = min(z/100000, 20)/100


    The probability of a moon forming p depends on:

    • the rounded debris percentage pz considering Kaelesh Supra-Refractor PF12K ,

    • the effect of lunar phases pq ∈ {0%, 1%, 2%, 3%},

    • bonus days pb ∈ {0%, 5%, 10%, 20%},

    The complete formula is:


    p = pz + pq + pb = 100·p₀(1 + 0.005·PF12K)/100 + pq + pb


    Note: In the expression ⌊100·x⌋/100, the number x < 1 is rounded down to two decimal places, i.e., down to full percentages. For example, for 12.86%, the calculation would be:
    ⌊100 · 0.1286⌋/100 = ⌊12.86⌋/100 = 12/100 = 12%.

  • Disappointing feature... I only tested the effect on the moon's diameter, so it's another useless technology, like most kaelesh.


    [...}


    So it remains to determine whether p0 or pz should be taken into the formula. Bremm Sparkfist can you test with fewer probes (table below)? Of course, we will also have to make sure that the moon phase does not add an additional 1% to the result!


    Sorry I was not available last week to perform any test !

    But I'm glad you were able to, I was truly wondering whether the building was bugged or not.


    While I agree it would have been nice for the (creation chance) bonus to be additive, I believe the most useful effect of the building is to get a bigger moon, much harder to destroy.

    Control Panel -> Settings -> General -> Display members’ signatures -> NO