Uni 1 Settings Change ( 1 last time)

Quote from Sun Wukong

40% df no deut, everything else stays the same. we got close to 50% last time, 3 or 4 votes(?), like tochint suggested lets try a little foreplay first and not try to ram it all in at once.....

70% is required to pass, not 50%.
I feel like any change that does not include an increase in ECO is doomed to fail.

The silent minority of miners will never vote to increase DF on it's own, and even deut to DF I don't see passing either.

So I think the only way to pass this is tied to an eco increase, or we can vote (september I think?), fail and then have to wait another 6 months to try again.

Quote from Y0m1

Quote from Sun Wukong

40% df no deut, everything else stays the same. we got close to 50% last time, 3 or 4 votes(?), like tochint suggested lets try a little foreplay first and not try to ram it all in at once.....

70% is required to pass, not 50%.
I feel like any change that does not include an increase in ECO is doomed to fail.

The silent minority of miners will never vote to increase DF on it's own, and even deut to DF I don't see passing either.

So I think the only way to pass this is tied to an eco increase, or we can vote (september I think?), fail and then have to wait another 6 months to try again.

as usual you misread what im saying yomi, we got close to 50% DF, we were 3 or 4 votes away

Quote from Sun Wukong

Quote from Y0m1

Quote from Sun Wukong

40% df no deut, everything else stays the same. we got close to 50% last time, 3 or 4 votes(?), like tochint suggested lets try a little foreplay first and not try to ram it all in at once.....

70% is required to pass, not 50%.
I feel like any change that does not include an increase in ECO is doomed to fail.

The silent minority of miners will never vote to increase DF on it's own, and even deut to DF I don't see passing either.

So I think the only way to pass this is tied to an eco increase, or we can vote (september I think?), fail and then have to wait another 6 months to try again.

as usual you misread what im saying yomi, we got close to 50% DF, we were 3 or 4 votes away

I didn't missread, you simply got it wrong.
Last vote result:

- DF 30%: 140 votes (42.6%)

- DF 50%: 189 votes (57.4%)

We were nowhere close.

Yeah, there's a little misunderstanding. It's the one from 2024 that almost got 70% x)

June 2024:

- 30% DF: 97 votes (31%)

- 50% DF: 215 votes (69%)

Total votes: 312

January 2025:

- DF 30%: 140 votes (42.6%)

- DF 50%: 189 votes (57.4%)

Quote from Neotinea

Yeah, there's a little misunderstanding. It's the one from 2024 that almost got 70% x)

June 2024:

- 30% DF: 97 votes (31%)

- 50% DF: 215 votes (69%)

Total votes: 312

January 2025:

- DF 30%: 140 votes (42.6%)

- DF 50%: 189 votes (57.4%)

Display More

tempus fugit, thanks for the clarity.

Quote from Y0m1

Quote from Sun Wukong

Quote from Y0m1

Quote from Sun Wukong

40% df no deut, everything else stays the same. we got close to 50% last time, 3 or 4 votes(?), like tochint suggested lets try a little foreplay first and not try to ram it all in at once.....

70% is required to pass, not 50%.
I feel like any change that does not include an increase in ECO is doomed to fail.

The silent minority of miners will never vote to increase DF on it's own, and even deut to DF I don't see passing either.

So I think the only way to pass this is tied to an eco increase, or we can vote (september I think?), fail and then have to wait another 6 months to try again.

as usual you misread what im saying yomi, we got close to 50% DF, we were 3 or 4 votes away

I didn't missread, you simply got it wrong.
Last vote result:

- DF 30%: 140 votes (42.6%)

- DF 50%: 189 votes (57.4%)

We were nowhere close.

Display More

slight mix up, you are technically correct, the best kind of correct.

Our minimum requirements should be DeutInDF & x10 eco.... But I'm happy for all the changes except for Duet cost 0.7.

I don't understand why we keep getting pushed back around x10, when Fafnir was recently changed to x10 due to Merge.... If U1 is always going to be a merge option then give us x10 eco as well.

Quote from Gh0st

Our minimum requirements should be DeutInDF & x10 eco.... But I'm happy for all the changes except for Duet cost 0.7.

I don't understand why we keep getting pushed back around x10, when Fafnir was recently changed to x10 due to Merge.... If U1 is always going to be a merge option then give us x10 eco as well.

"BECAUSE" that's basically the only reason given. Stupid.

I voted as ally told to me //

but I think df boost make that more profitable and make me tired a lot

gkp is probably the main reason the increase in df doesnt go through

Quote from red2141

I voted as ally told to me //

but I think df boost make that more profitable and make me tired a lot

A 10-20% DF increase is insignificant in your ss you provided, nor will a Def bash ever be a significant difference for that lot. They have proven time and time again they are willing to bash for a loss/ get ninja'd every week as bashing defense is the only way they can climax, even at the expensive of their own fleet 1/18th of the time.

About settings increase, myself and my buddies (probably about 6-8) will be voting no to any setting increases without eco being on the table.

Are we getting a vote?

We are waiting for Neotinea to tell us when 10x eco will be on the table and then vote should be; 10x eco+ 30% deut into DF or 10x eco + 50% deut into DF. If it is just vote for 10x eco im voting no

Meanwhile, .us COMA, not Admin is still in active discussions about the change to 10x eco for at least 4 additional unis now, including already sending out ingame messages about potential changes while .org Admins, not COMA just shuts any x10 discussions down immediately LOLOL. Ive not even bothered to check other coms.

wated effort to many zeros playing heros. Miners whobTake as much as possible but won't budge on a moral high ground thats built on tnt while holding a cigar.

The game is dead. It's been slowly dying for years. Uni 1 is only profitable on P&L accounts from 2 players packing back their fleet 69 times

Things need to change make it worth investing time and effort into. If miners don't want to get hit learn to res save fleet save or go play angry birds or Cod.

Hats off To rabbit ever the optimistic, i just feel its wasted effort on an undeserving cause. It's dead and buried let it rot.

Quote from KeVLaR

Meanwhile, .us COMA, not Admin is still in active discussions about the change to 10x eco for at least 4 additional unis now, including already sending out ingame messages about potential changes while .org Admins, not COMA just shuts any x10 discussions down immediately LOLOL. Ive not even bothered to check other coms

Other communities are allowing x10 at will it seems. Was told the other day another community just approved multiple x10 eco votes.

Quote from johocknut

Other communities are allowing x10 at will it seems. Was told the other day another community just approved multiple x10 eco votes.

You know you can quote it and post here with translation so people actually see proof, or screenshot it. I hope you are not expecting people to be "trust me bro" based on your words . Still voting no if it is only change in eco and no change to DF in spite of miners

Just had a message about this in game so I might as well comment again

It's pretty clear the uni 1 community (mostly) wants 10x eco, and to be blunt I think a poll without that is a waste of time

Any other polls are just unlikely to pass in a uni like this

Ya so funny, community wants 10x eco - na cant have that 10/10 troll

Quote from hedgefundpoe

Ya so funny, community wants 10x eco - na cant have that 10/10 troll

Its cause we are not ogame.tr

Settings have to be a package not individual.

10x eco even though we’re not allowed

2x friendly for expos which has barely been addressed

Deut in DF because it should have been implemented not put to a vote in the first place

50% DF, to ensure the vote fails

0.7 Deut to help the poor miners fleetsave at x2 friendly