VEGA new settings 2025

  • As much as I like deut in df Godiva does make a logical point, since the SI of a ship is calculated without adding in deut it would stand that no deut is actually physically present in the ship so it shouldn't go to a df


    But this is ogame and the are many times it is not logical 😆

  • As much as I like deut in df Godiva does make a logical point, since the SI of a ship is calculated without adding in deut it would stand that no deut is actually physically present in the ship so it shouldn't go to a df


    But this is ogame and the are many times it is not logical 😆

    I heard that DE ogame thinks otherwise. But of course we must be poor bastard child as always without x10 eco or deut in df.

  • I agree with previous posts, deut is a commodity that can be traded between players and should remain that way. You already have 70% DF, if you want more deut just trade/merch some of those profits to fuel your ships.

  • My reasoning for no D in DF is this.
    Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen. It is an energy source for powering ships. The Deut required to build a large ship is not that the Deuterium goes into the STRUCTURE of the ship, it represents the power needed to build the ship.

    I can see where capturing D when destroying a ship could happen IF the ship were TRANSPORTING Deuterium as cargo. The cargo container could survive and that Deut captured… but not the D that was used to build the ship.

    Thank god you are here to explain to everyone here how ogame is not imaginary game but rather real life empires being controlled by us humans for our own amusement so how could it be possible to bend the rules of the universe?

    wait its not?

    "How you gonna listen when you always talking? Walking a different walk than the one that you barking"

  • Hello,


    For your information, the poll will close on October 21, but please note that the results will not necessarily be announced on that date.


    Also, I'm sorry for the time it took, I won't use the word "shortly" anymore, I promise ; )

    b1L8C8d.png

    "Когда ты смотришь на мир, помни, что каждый человек — это книга, о которой ты ничего не знаешь."

    > Forum rules <

  • Hello,


    For your information, the poll will close on October 21, but please note that the results will not necessarily be announced on that date.


    Also, I'm sorry for the time it took, I won't use the word "shortly" anymore, I promise ; )

    We will forgive you for your sins <3

  • BTW just figured why isnt this poll showing live results? wouldn't that benefit everyone involved to see the numbers move over days and not just wait blindly waiting for some official decision on what is voted for? any legit reason for non transparancy here?

    "How you gonna listen when you always talking? Walking a different walk than the one that you barking"

  • BTW just figured why isnt this poll showing live results? wouldn't that benefit everyone involved to see the numbers move over days and not just wait blindly waiting for some official decision on what is voted for? any legit reason for non transparancy here?

    Results are as follows;

    90% in favor for 2x war speed

    92% in favor for 0.5 deut



    Who needs transparancy when voting...you don't have that in real life why would you have it ingame >insert poop emoji< :kpinch:

  • Hello,


    Results:

    - War Fleet speed x2: 126 votes (44%)

    - War Fleet speed x1: 161 votes (56%)


    - Deuterium into DF OFF: 136 votes (47%)

    - Deuterium into DF ON: 151 votes (53%)


    - Deuterium consumption 70%: 116 votes (40%)

    - Deuterium consumption 50%: 171 votes (60%)


    Total votes: 287


    No changes will be made as no option received 70% of the votes

    b1L8C8d.png

    "Когда ты смотришь на мир, помни, что каждый человек — это книга, о которой ты ничего не знаешь."

    > Forum rules <

  • I wonder why nobody in the staff has ever considered the obvious elephant in the room: that someone can manipulate a vote by simply firing up a VPN and creating a slew of multis using burner e-mail accounts. It doesn't matter if the next day all the multis are banned, all it matters is they get to cast a vote. Now, make it a group effort and you easily have 40-50 phantom votes that can completely flip the result.


    An easy fix would be to restrict the vote to accounts that have been there since some time, say 2 months, and/or to those that have had some activity in a certain period of time before the poll is activated. This would get rid of both multis and long-dead accounts resurrected only to cast a vote. But hey, it's GF, so i don't see it happening anytime soon.

    uni1.en - Supernoob

  • I wonder why nobody in the staff has ever considered the obvious elephant in the room: that someone can manipulate a vote by simply firing up a VPN and creating a slew of multis using burner e-mail accounts. It doesn't matter if the next day all the multis are banned, all it matters is they get to cast a vote. Now, make it a group effort and you easily have 40-50 phantom votes that can completely flip the result.


    An easy fix would be to restrict the vote to accounts that have been there since some time, say 2 months, and/or to those that have had some activity in a certain period of time before the poll is activated. This would get rid of both multis and long-dead accounts resurrected only to cast a vote. But hey, it's GF, so i don't see it happening anytime soon.

    So IG vote is happening. I am curious Prongs chaosk why don't you make a prerequisite for a poll so only accounts older then atleast 180 days can vote?

    Look up top. You won't get any response from "responsible" people who can answer you that in more detail :D. I think it is quite sad that ogame doesn't havea function that measures time spent playing for every account. If they don't have that internally atleast then im dumbfounded :fatgreengrin:. It would be so easy to see who is playing and who isn't. VM ofcourse wouldn't count since you are not playing so you could implament proper vote for active community from that server.


    I mean lets be real...287 players voted. This is beyond hilarious :lol:. Server that on average has 30-40 online users suddenly has 287 voting, pure ignorance from GF and whoever is responsible for checking validity of votes.

  • Neotinea, any way for admins to see who voted and cut out brand new accounts, long term inactive accounts? No matter which side you're on, unfair votes are not cool.

    Just lol ,vote didnt go in your favor , and you are crying now. LOL. there will be lot of crying ingame. That I can tell for sure