VEGA new settings 2025

  • I just want to say that anyone participating in this discussion has the ability to adapt to new changes. I'm from Wurren and I've adapted like everyone else.

    I think a poll shouldn't create all this fuss...

    It's fine for me x1 x2 x4 x1bn

    You're too nervous xD

  • At this point, it is evident that finding a combo of settings that would make everyone happy is utterly impossible. Therefore, it would be better to shift the focus onto something that would make everyone equally UNHAPPY, so nobody will complain about unfair treatment.


    One recurring theme is fleeters complaining about miners having it too easy, and miners complaining about fleeters for the same exact reason, in reverse. So let's make it hard for both and the quarrel will end.


    Also, non-turtles complaining about turtles building too much defense, and turtles complaining about IPMs and deathstars overpowered against defense. Instead of trying to appease both parties, how about punishing them both?


    You can't really complain about being too deep in the crap if everybody around you is immersed in the exact same level of crap.

    uni1.en - Supernoob

  • peaceful x1

    war speed x0.5

    deut consumtion increase 1.25

    eco x 8 - x 5

    defence into debri.

    debri field 20%

    Senza-titolo-1.jpg










  • Every time the peaceful speed changes in a uni, the overnight fleetsave is fubar,

    (especially x5 or higher). forced to vmode until another merger. :(

    Hope you x6 guys will consider changing your vote.

    That's why its removed in my suggestion, looks like most people agree with that,

    except for the 2 trolls above your message which would get no ones support and would never even go to a vote, maybe try your own uni see if you get some support there 😉


  • I don't think some of these settings are even possible, we should stick to what we can reasonably achieve.


    I'll reiterate my proposal, this time with some explanation why it is a desirable change:


    1) eco x8 to x4


    Everyone wants it to be raised to x10, so it is obvious we should take the opposite direction. Also, hello whale, did you just purchase 1k packs with real money? Then, enjoy their yeld being cut in half haha.


    2) war fleet speed x2 to x1


    For fleeters, this is akin to garlic for vampires or honesty for politicians.


    3) peaceful fleet speed x4 to x8


    Deploys in-system at min speed with a deathstar will be reduced to 5 hours or less. Have fun fleetsaving.


    4) DiDF 0% to 50%


    Knock knock turtle, deathstars are coming. Too bad you can't fleetsave your bunker.



    Moreover, the debris field percentage should stick at 70% so everyone who gets hit will mald because only scraps will be recovered from the space dock. Also, DiDF should stay OFF so the attackers can mald as well thinking about how much deuterium could have been recovered from the debris field.

    uni1.en - Supernoob

  • dont worry guys , they opening 5th 10eco server in TR so im sure we can have 5 too, or was it 4 coz de, or 2 coz org or i dont fukin know anymore

    that is perfect!


    so that means that Vega, Lacerta and uni 1 are getting x10 eco

    great news!


    scratch that, i see now that api shows its x8 eco

    someone might want to update that new universe image thats posted in announcements
    yohdh  chaosk

    AvOZINI.png

    Vreme će proći pa moći će svi da vide

    Kako stojimo ponosni, večni ko piramide

    Edited once, last by Asto Vidatu ().

  • Some big words towards Mortis,

    I will remind all to check on the first page of this post and see what

    the MAJORITY wants !

    You can always have opinion,

    but what I know for sure is that Mortis helped to clean this uni

    from cheaters more than once, and very successfully...

    movie-machete-wallpaper-preview.jpg

  • Who is Mortis?

    I will remind all to check Page 7 after my suggestion, which also includes what the majority wants and includes all favorites from page 1

    Only thing im wondering is when Neotina said "shortly" how long she actually meant 🤔

  • I see mortis found a way to play uni in vmode. From which he will never get out. Same as you. Anyhow can you send me your supplier number since I am very au courant with Vega history and Mortis so far did squat. And his theories and self proclaimed victories are in rang of Russian propaganda machine. Grandiose but nothing set in reality. Anyhow give us vote with all options on table. Lets see how it turns out.

  • What mortis won, was an etern vmode and his mates being farms 😂

    Aaaaand, still X1 will not pass.


    Btw, come to play, we are nice, leave that blue mode machete

  • Hello all, long time no see, if I may add my two cents here as an old timer coming back. Nice to see some old faces, some not so much, and there are not enough new ones.


    Hostile x2 I feel is like the gold standard and defines what Vega is, going x1 is ridiculous and anything higher than current setting just a delusional and wishful thinking.


    Two biggest points here might be deut in DF and defense in DF. To add one is ok to an extent, to add both is too big of a buff for big fleets and outright preposterous. Plus defense in df, up to what percentage is "reasonable"? As standards for todays fleets is what, couple of tens of thousands of rips? Bananas.


    If us, miners and peaceful players can't have x10 eco, why should we say yes to any of two above?


    Also, if we were to go with options like this, percentage needs to be worked on as well:

    "Debris 60% + deut in DF ON (the two options would be voted on together)",

    ie. df even lower then, 50% might cut it.


    TLDR;

    From what I see at the moment, most of the proposed changes benefit fleeters, not much for the rest of the folks.

  • Correct, at least for now its not an option, although IF it becomes avaiable, we won't have to wait for 6 months for a new official vote and we will be able to vote for it directly

    We won't have to wait 6months in theory, yet if we consider how fast we get any response from GF in general, yes we'll be able to vote within 6 months, but could also take 2 years :)

  • My reasoning for no D in DF is this.
    Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen. It is an energy source for powering ships. The Deut required to build a large ship is not that the Deuterium goes into the STRUCTURE of the ship, it represents the power needed to build the ship.

    I can see where capturing D when destroying a ship could happen IF the ship were TRANSPORTING Deuterium as cargo. The cargo container could survive and that Deut captured… but not the D that was used to build the ship.

  • My reasoning for no D in DF is this.
    Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen. It is an energy source for powering ships. The Deut required to build a large ship is not that the Deuterium goes into the STRUCTURE of the ship, it represents the power needed to build the ship.

    I can see where capturing D when destroying a ship could happen IF the ship were TRANSPORTING Deuterium as cargo. The cargo container could survive and that Deut captured… but not the D that was used to build the ship.

    Thank god you are here to explain to everyone here how ogame is not imaginary game but rather real life empires being controlled by us humans for our own amusement so how could it be possible to bend the rules of the universe?