Display MoreSomething like this?
Option C Eco Research Peaceful Fleet Holding Fleet War Fleet Galaxies ACS DF DiDF Bonus Fields Galaxy System Deut Consumption Probe Storage Starting DM Category Deuterium to DF Empty systems Inactive systems Universe 1 x10 x20 x1 x1 x1 9 ON 30% 0% 30 Circular Circular 100% OFF 25.000 Miner Yes No No Lacerta x8 x16 x4 x2 x2 5 OFF 60% 0% 30 Circular Circular 60% ON 8.000 Balanced Yes No No NewA x10 x20 x5 x5 x5 7 ON 50% 0% 30 Circular Circular 50% OFF 8.000 Fleeter Yes No No NewB x10 x20 x6 x3 x3 8 ON 50% 0% 30 Circular Circular 50% OFF 8.000 Balanced Yes No No NewC x10 x20 x4 x2 x2 9 ON 40% 0% 30 Circular Circular 50% OFF 8.000 Miner Yes No No
Group 1
Exodus: Vega, Thuban, Fafnir, Hercules, Imai, Jishui
Target: Universe 1, Lacerta, New A, New B
Group 2
Exodus: Grus, Keid, Lyra, Mars
Target: U1, Lacerta, New A, New B, New C
this is a step in right direction, way better than options A and B
if the idea is to preserve one NO ACS uni i understand
but if thats the case why not make New D that will be equal to what Lacerta is now
keep it x8 eco, no acs but make it a fresh new uni
that way you give those who asked to go out of Lacerta a chance to do so
and if there are players who want no acs uni let them have it
on the other hand as someone who plays x4 friendly x2 hostile
mainly as expo..i wouldnt have ideal target..which is somewhat fine
if i want to get x10 eco i have to risk going x3 hostile
which brings in faster expos at x6..decent trade of but very specific for expoers who are willing to risk
however im not sure that fits miners and/or fleeters of existing x2s unis