IG account: Zeb
Server: Vega
The 10 days I wish to participate: 10 - 12 - 14 - 16 - 18 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24
Posts by ScolarVisari
-
-
Neotinea Looks like we are ready for a real vote.
-
Display More
Display More
Display More
Display MoreHere i got 2 new options that might give all playstyles a little boost?
Option 1;2 war
4 holding
8 peaceful
50% debris
deut in debris
0.6 consunption
Why these settings?
No change in war speed
4x holding to perhaps make ninjas more likely to happend.
8x peaceful for more expos / sending resources around for the none fleeters.
50%+deut will slightly give more profit then 70% without deut.
-0.1 comsumption for less deutusages.
Option2;
1 war
2 holding
8 peaceful
60% debris
deut in debris
0.5 consumption
Why these settings?
1x war to give players more change to survive a hit
2x holding to perhaps make ninjas more likely against fleeters
8x peaceful for faster/more expos / sending resources around for the none fleeters.60%+deut will give a huge boost in debris due lower warspeed.
0.5 is the lowest consumption possible because of lower warspeed.Love to hear input
We need a vote between old setting and new proposed setting, not a group of settings, like you showed. A choice between group of settings won’t satisfy enough of us to bring any changes. Tweaks where it’s needed will work for the majority making Vega more attractive in the future.
We need a vote like bastard showed, which was intended, but presented in a messy manner at the start of this thread
One vote only between the old and the new option.
This way, all options have their chance to get through, or not, depending on the players demand.
vote 1Debris 60% + deut in DF ON (the two options would be voted on together)
or
Debris 70% (current setting) and without adding deut into df
vote 2Peaceful x6
or
Peaceful x4 (current setting)
Vote 3
Holding/war x1
or
Holding/war x2 (current setting)
Vote 40.5 consumption
or
0.7 consumption (current setting)
Neotinea i think we are ready
Fly safeOh my bad. i removed option 3 after spelllingchecks and such. TY for noticing. Option 3 would have been no changes at all... :') i will update
You guys are forgetting that people want x4 war as an option to vote aswell, this should not be forgotten, alongside with 80% + deut in df which is also not mentioned like in bastards suggestion, the rest is okay
Because i am trying to make realistic options that all playstyles should benefit from.
Why add 4x war when the informative poll already shows 2x war is not even wanted by a milestone. 80%+deut.. i mean.... make a few sims with 50%+deut, 60%+deut and 70% without and you will see that even 50%+deut is already an increase in debris over 70% without.
The fact is both sides have to make concessions, or else there will never be any change and i might aswell just ask Neo to close this post... -
Display More
Display More
Here i got 2 new options that might give all playstyles a little boost?
Option 1;2 war
4 holding
8 peaceful
50% debris
deut in debris
0.6 consunption
Why these settings?
No change in war speed
4x holding to perhaps make ninjas more likely to happend.
8x peaceful for more expos / sending resources around for the none fleeters.
50%+deut will slightly give more profit then 70% without deut.
-0.1 comsumption for less deutusages.
Option2;
1 war
2 holding
8 peaceful
60% debris
deut in debris
0.5 consumption
Why these settings?
1x war to give players more change to survive a hit
2x holding to perhaps make ninjas more likely against fleeters
8x peaceful for faster/more expos / sending resources around for the none fleeters.60%+deut will give a huge boost in debris due lower warspeed.
0.5 is the lowest consumption possible because of lower warspeed.Love to hear input
We need a vote between old setting and new proposed setting, not a group of settings, like you showed. A choice between group of settings won’t satisfy enough of us to bring any changes. Tweaks where it’s needed will work for the majority making Vega more attractive in the future.
We need a vote like bastard showed, which was intended, but presented in a messy manner at the start of this thread
One vote only between the old and the new option.
This way, all options have their chance to get through, or not, depending on the players demand.
vote 1Debris 60% + deut in DF ON (the two options would be voted on together)
or
Debris 70% (current setting) and without adding deut into df
vote 2Peaceful x6
or
Peaceful x4 (current setting)
Vote 3
Holding/war x1
or
Holding/war x2 (current setting)
Vote 40.5 consumption
or
0.7 consumption (current setting)
Neotinea i think we are ready
Fly safeOh my bad. i removed option 3 after spelllingchecks and such. TY for noticing. Option 3 would have been no changes at all... :') i will update
-
Here i got 2 new options that might give all playstyles a little boost?
Option 1;2 war
4 holding
8 peaceful
50% debris
deut in debris
0.6 consunption
Why these settings?
No change in war speed
4x holding to perhaps make ninjas more likely to happend.
8x peaceful for more expos / sending resources around for the none fleeters.
50%+deut will slightly give more profit then 70% without deut.
-0.1 comsumption for less deutusages.
Option2;
1 war
2 holding
8 peaceful
60% debris
deut in debris
0.5 consumption
Why these settings?
1x war to give players more change to survive a hit
2x holding to perhaps make ninjas more likely against fleeters
8x peaceful for faster/more expos / sending resources around for the none fleeters.60%+deut will give a huge boost in debris due lower warspeed.
0.5 is the lowest consumption possible because of lower warspeed.Option 3;
No changes
Love to hear input
-
Display MoreHeyy
Of course, could you give me the options I need to insert?
For example:
Deut into DF + 60% DF (if you want to test combined options)
(The informative poll is only on the forum, but an IG PM can be sent so that people can see this discussion)
I think this should do it?
Eco 10
Debris 60% included deut in DF
Debris 70% excluded deut in DF
Peaceful *4
Peaceful *6
Holding/War *1
Holding/War *2
0.5 Consumption
0.7 Consumption
Yes, i am aware the eco 10 is not possible currently. Is there any news about requesting eco10 in the near future?
-
Is it possible we could get an informative voting poll in our server after all?
Looks like there are certain new proposals and i guess starting a votingpoll with all the requests ingame might be te best solution to see what the server really wants?
-
Display More
Display More
Hello,
I'm sorry if my message was confusing, I just wanted to point out that it's not possible at the moment.
Regarding the other options, what would you like to do?
Would you like us to send an IG message to spark discussion about possible changes?
A poll on the forum to find out which options you would like before the IG poll?
DtDF
to clarify; Deut in debris field
-
Display More
Hello,
I'm sorry if my message was confusing, I just wanted to point out that it's not possible at the moment.
Regarding the other options, what would you like to do?
Would you like us to send an IG message to spark discussion about possible changes?
A poll on the forum to find out which options you would like before the IG poll?
Before i even made this forum post i asked players in VEGA themself what they would prefer / find acceptable for changing the DF%, DtDF and lower fuel usage. The only option for none fleeters...? requesting 10* eco.... If that cant even be made possible anno 2025, why would none fleeters (whom are still a big majority on probably every server) vote yes on (looking at the responses so far) positive changes without getting anything in return themself?
Perhaps its time to give the older servers the 10* eco boosts (perhaps even 12*??
), and new servers stick to the 8* instead. This way the community (ergo the non fleeters) might look more positive to future merges aswell. -
INFORMATIVE POLL, THE OFFICIAL POLL WILL TAKE PLACE IG.
Since the server merges are over, i have been asking around on VEGA what kind of changes players would like to see. I was far from done, but since other servers are already posting their requests, VEGA can not stay behind.
Below are the most requested changes so far:
eco 10(edited by Neo because impossible)speed 4/2/2
debris 60%
deut in debris
0.5 deut consumption
The new options have pro's and cons for our fleeters and miners.
However, feel free to discuss further because many VEGA players have not shared their opinion yet.
-
Better question. Is this a one timer because we had a TRE event last week, or is this a permanent change?
-
insert clown emoji
-
Getting farmed and then bashed to death by GKP and Co. is the most appealing server setting of uni 1 to me
hahaha so true been there done that so ill just move to Vega and risk it there.
i believe alot of wurren players are going to vega
-
thx. well Uni one here i come. gonna miss Wurren.
uni 1 is soooooooo slow tho. you are gonna regret that if you do alot of expos
-
Been Looking on forum And cant find any info on What servers will be affected. im on Wurren and people on server say we are affected, can someone tell me what server i end up on and when this is happening ?
-
Keeping the dream alive
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
Lets try and save Wurren from exodus
There is currently a large push for Wurren to be made a target universe.Hundreds of tickets have been sent, requesting this change, which will benefit many of those unhappy with the current merge options.
In the past, ogame has been convinced to change the merge status of universes upon request by enough players.
So, if you wish to attempt to try this, please follow these instructions:
1) Select Support
2) Select Contact Support
3) Select 'Game'
4) Select your universe
5) Enter your Nickname
6) Enter your email
7) Select Servermerge or Account Deletion
Then copy and paste the following message (and Submit):
Please make Wurren a target universe.
Thank you.
Also, please share these instructions with your alliance
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
-
The CoMa is not in hidding mode, very far from it.
In a time of vacations, you might well know what is happening.
If important figures of the company who are the connection between the playerbase and the company are not even available to do their job, you might want to consider to change the date of these VERY important merges?
-
Display More
Like 60% of the comments in this thread are players who are obviusly clueless about game mechanics...this is one of the times i am grateful that GF doesn't listen to its community and just does what they want.
Many of us have invested some money in DM and we are now gonna get chewed by the older universe and all that we invested will go to waste.
You aint gonna get chewed by anyone if you know how to FS. Also you did not invest money in your account, you gambled it away on game currency that provides you with p2w powerups.
Also do you think in older universes there aren't players who start from 0? I hope you don't believe that there are only old accounts there
Ofc I do FS, I am pretty active player and top 3 of all active accounts in points destroyed and honour points. I know what I am doing. But the issue isn't that. Our server is a bit over one year old and our target server will probably be Uni1. I can loose all my moons there in one night if someone decides that they could use some resources from my fleet. We are also being thrown who knows at which coords and we will have just a little time to plan our repositioning/relocation.
And, yes, people do start fresh on these servers, but they have time to build up their account slowly, to build up their friends and allies network and to adapt. We are literally being thrown into the unknown while people that have literally 100 times or even more points, will be able to slap us.
And for your third point, call it gambling or call it whatever you want, but just screwing over your paying customers isn't a way to conduct a business.
Like I said, it would make much more sense to merge low pop unies with similar settings and power ratios. Out of 10 unis with 200 players, you could make 1 strong uni with 2k players.
This way to merge unis is clearly a bad decision and they should reconsider what they are doing for the sake of their playerbase. However, from what I have read in this thread, they do not care much about their players. Some of them do, but the majority doesn't.
Youand your server would be very welcome to join a group like this;
Undea
Wurren
Yin
Bharani
and perhaps Aries, Grus aswell
Lyra could be a next year merge.
server settings could be discussed, but i would not mind merging into Yin at all. -
You write like a true fleeter. not everone plays the same style.
also, just because fleets aint getting crashed, does not mean there aint any active fleeters.
-
For what it's worth... As a Xuange player, I agree that having Zodiac as a target would likely become the number one choice.
If we were to have been included in the last set of merges (as had been requested) then Thuban would have been a decent option. Now it's so far matured from Xuange it's hard to see how it would really work.
Xuange, Zodiac, Ceres, Eris, Fafnir. maby Aries and Grus aswell?
For next year perhaps Hercules, Imai, Jishui, Keid. And perhaps Lyra.You guys could have an epic server merge now and probably next year aswell if GF would use just a tiny amount ore sense
