Posts by Scar

Marshmello wrote:

Any implications, accusations, or discussion of cheating/bans from here on out is receiving a warning. Including from the original poster. Thank you.

You need to chill a bit.

NoMoreAngel wrote:

Now you are allowed to troll/poke and accuse other people of cheating to a certain degree. If you are going overboard with it, you will still get warned.

Read this before you rage on your keyboard, jesus this guy, calm down!

savage wrote:

CR convert services

Please don't ever help anyone with CR conversions, it's giving everybody a headache.

i'd give this post 3/10

No sexy pic

No story

Juicy Profit

Once agian, FR, keep spamming them LFs

100G baby!

FR to all.

Wraith02 wrote:

Scar wrote:

I'm facing the same issue when I try to vacation mode or make certain changes, it asks if i want to change my nickname to something I had changed in the past.

I do not want to clear my browser history or auto-fill option, OGame is a browser game, shouldn't it just not allow that section to be auto-populated?

Try going into the saved PWs / usernames and removing any entry for your uni - the only PW that's needed these days is the lobby PW, which shouldn't cause any issue.

In chrome: Settings -> passwords -> and remove any entry for the server(s ) your on.

It should be roughly the same with Chrome on mobile devices as well.

Nope, I tried it and it's still populating the same thing.

I'm facing the same issue when I try to vacation mode or make certain changes, it asks if i want to change my nickname to something I had changed in the past.

I do not want to clear my browser history or auto-fill option, OGame is a browser game, shouldn't it just not allow that section to be auto-populated?

Cassandra Vandales wrote:

Sure, you can choose that, but you would still have to deal with people in the universe who you can hardly communicate with. And this is a major part of OGame.

It's new, that's why you have the marketplace now, with the language option it facilitates the communication gap... and people play with an alliance such the Turk Team, the Chinese team, the Russian team, etc... There's nothing new here.

Cassandra Vandales wrote:

Scar wrote:

I would love to see the international merger happening but I don't think the staff is ready.

The issue is that you cannot really merge internationally due to the languages. Not everybody speaks English decent enough, and even though there are translation sites, it is just not enough for real interaction.

Congratulations on your new position Cassy.

I don't think interaction's an issue, implementing V6, MCO, DM to Resources, etc... had a severe impact on the player-base and that's when people weren't asking for those changes.

Imagine where the majority is asking for the change.

Cassandra Vandales wrote:

if all languages are allowed it can be quite hard to communicate well.

How about an option where you select your language, maybe it could be found in the option tab or maybe at the bottom of the page, that will ease things.

Mikoto wrote:

It was a lot of issues with inactives going blue, and accounts with huge fleet out of blue automatically, Gameforge having to spend a while dealing with fixing those isssues.

And a lot of upset people being Merged from x3 uni to x1 or x5 speeds. So yes an international merge would be the best option so a uni from x2 doesn’t get merged into a x4 speed uni

Scar

That's the result of poor management.

I would love to see the international merger happening but I don't think the staff is ready.

What was wrong with the last merge?

Valent can you further elaborate the tolerance? I don't why there's a percentage, why not just select 0%?

Is there any update?

Sir Lancelot wrote:

so, enlighten me please, what is that you have updated/changed regarding classes?

I assume it's an FAQ.

Snip

Gebrunn fix the tag as it's a solo hit.

Warned for backseat modding.

- Marshmello

Cassandra Vandales wrote:

the rules, even though some like them to be harsher, are the same for everyone.

Hello Cassy, I would dispute that argument, you and I both know that it's not the same for everyone, the volunteers are bias and gives leeway to some and are harsh on others. I can give you a list of instances that had occurred over the years. So yes, let's not fool ourselves here.

As for the original post, I'd say the same thing, most of the volunteers are on an ego trip... Bias towards their friends and/or people they like. Just ridiculous if you ask me. It has nothing to do with how much DM you buy.

Dragon wrote:

Scar wrote:

Grimm wrote:

In the same way that the devs can't even bother to separate Defensive Military points from Economy (what a stupid thing to consider defensive structures as economy), they won't bother to change this either.

In reality it should be:

-Military: All Fighting Ships and All defensive structures (including IPMs and ABMs). Probes, Recyclers and Cargos would count only for 50% military points since they are not exactly full blown military ships (no attack power).
-Economy Points: Mines, Fusion Reactors, Crawlers, Solar Sats, Solar Plants. Basically, everything that makes you produce either resources or energy. Plasma Tech and Energy Tech could also be counted as 100% economy while being also 100% Research since they do the same, increase energy and resource production. TL:DR Economy points should only be what you produce.
-Research Points: All researches, obviously.

Everything else, like all facilities and storages should not be counted towards any of these 3 categories but of course, count towards your overall in the Highscore.

It shouldn't be that difficult to do this?

Display More

I've pointed this out, the entire thing must be reworked including the rules.

We all know nothing's going to change though.

Display More

The more changes GF does, the worse the game gets. Just saying.

Display More

Not if they make changes focused on the customer's benefits.

Grimm wrote:

In the same way that the devs can't even bother to separate Defensive Military points from Economy (what a stupid thing to consider defensive structures as economy), they won't bother to change this either.

In reality it should be:

-Military: All Fighting Ships and All defensive structures (including IPMs and ABMs). Probes, Recyclers and Cargos would count only for 50% military points since they are not exactly full blown military ships (no attack power).
-Economy Points: Mines, Fusion Reactors, Crawlers, Solar Sats, Solar Plants. Basically, everything that makes you produce either resources or energy. Plasma Tech and Energy Tech could also be counted as 100% economy while being also 100% Research since they do the same, increase energy and resource production. TL:DR Economy points should only be what you produce.
-Research Points: All researches, obviously.

Everything else, like all facilities and storages should not be counted towards any of these 3 categories but of course, count towards your overall in the Highscore.

It shouldn't be that difficult to do this?

Display More

I've pointed this out, the entire thing must be reworked including the rules.

We all know nothing's going to change though.

Let's talk merge, shall we?

Gebrunn it's a solo top 10, you've tagged it as ACS

Care for the back story? Looks like backstab.

FR to all.

Couldn't finish off cargos

0/10 for the hit

thread lacks sexy pics

0/10 for the post