Basically because of few people in org that used this as massive advantage, everyone else is punished.
Those that used that are already too far ahead, imbalance created after v8 can't be fixed.
Basically because of few people in org that used this as massive advantage, everyone else is punished.
Those that used that are already too far ahead, imbalance created after v8 can't be fixed.
Congrats mate,gg
Fr def
Thank you Spidey on reminder how things have changed over the years.
Nostalgia.
It's all your fault Tiz ![]()
Btw Apostle i m sure your feedback will be listened ![]()
But you forget that both parties have agreed on those trades, either party can ask for maximum or deny it.Nobody is forcing anyone to trade on 2:1:1 ,if its damaging for one side that side agrees,if one side trades for maximum 3:2:1 thats the problem or not for the both trading parties involved in the trade. Simply neither one side is forcing anyone to trade on different ratios,its matter if choice or what they agree.Its what trading world is all about.
What kinda mind thought that killing trade between the players is good idea? Wasn't the best idea to put trade ratio on average ratio 2.5 1.5 1 that for years was the best and most fair, not to mention that most fleeters used those rates to trade,you are practically killing it basics of fleeters growth..or starting with every uni everyone should become first miners or just the most ideal way for GF buy themselves mines or possibly deut packs to actually fleet?Not to mention that in uni1 where deut is costly and df is low so you are practically already doomed..I m sincerely lost for words on what this community is becoming,how we have only those rules, merges without any care for players base..
Oh looks like seasonal uni woke up the fleeter inside you ![]()
Gg
Fr def
Interesting, shouldn't be a case but who knows with Gf.
Anyway i like how Lord Prongs got active by deleting some of old threads and posts but couldn't write a post in here.
Many players complain because they don't like the merger, but given the activity rate, it's more than necessary to do so, because staying in a dead universe isn't very motivating.
The only solution to keep as many universes as possible to satisfy the greatest number of people is to have a large number of operators. After all, you get nothing for nothing. But here's the harsh reality: no one wants to get involved. It's also up to you to make sure that the larger the staff, the easier it will be to organise better and do more.
You have no idea what you talking about.Considering that many stuff members dont even play the game is also one of the reasons we have reached this point of no return.
Display MoreThe CoMa is not in hidding mode, very far from it.
In a time of vacations, you might well know what is happening.
His work is not only resumed to check some things here and there, there's more running in the background that you don't know.
Again, thank you all for expressing your honest feelings, even if it's hard for us to read them.
You all have our sympatie.
Sorry if i am wrong, but we judge on what we see,and we see years of players being ignored from the company, and the coma is there to send the feedback to them. If they don't listen him i see his role pointless, because things seem happening automatically. From the time of v8 version where players repeatedly were saying the stuff about how bad will that version impact on the game and its balance.The main problem was that because the most problems came from the that version and all imbalance we see today started there, but hey who are we to be listened.Just a sheeps in the line.
Surely by the end of the year more than half of the players that are gonna merge wont be even here.Another failure by GF,i m not sure do they have project manager in their company ,if they do I think projecting what they will earn by the decisions they are making in the future is gonna cost them once more than they know or care.From my personal experience they will reach once point without return if they aren't already.
yohdh thanks for responding at least unlike our lovely coma that usually is hiding mode when it comes to bigger things around his community.
Still no response from our Lord Prong,
why we don't have any poll for possible changes?
It would be nice if the devs could figure out how to make the door swing both ways during a merge and make unis simultaneously exodus & target so players who want to leave their uni can do so...
GameForge - laziness is our only option.
Display MoreHaving more than 2 servers with Eco 10x is not possible for now, maybe in the future, we will continue to ask to have at least 1 more universe.
As already said, we had tried to have new servers for the targets universes, but the reply was negative.
When the plans were made, some were not approved and only this scenario was accepted accordingly with some base factors, as active accounts on the universes, to keep a non ACS universe along with another universe with ACS with the same specs, where the players could choose betwwen them.
I can ask it it's possible to have a different merger plan according with your feedback, or at least to have universe Zodiac as a target for Group 1.
I would also to thank you for efforts and time to ellaborate some scenarios and suggest settings change, it was deeply appreciated.
Please remember that after the merges you can ask for settings change, and if the poll runs well you can tailor the universe to your desired settings as long it's possible to change them.
Thanks for your effort,i hope they will finally listen , because we all know they care about money and we are giving them absolutely that possibility to earn more in longer period instead. Unfortunately i think they wont try even to listen, usual GF stuff.
Edit as requested by King Rabbit
Display MoreDisplay MoreCan you present a plan that will be suitable for you?
We don't know what can be done, but at least we can try.
With the current scenario, will it be enough to change some universe specs, like changing the universe speed, or something else?
Do not forget that Gameforge it's a company that needs incoming to keep the servers running and only them have that figures that we don't know, so some decisions can rely on that results.
We can only voice your complains, nothing more, nothin less.
Don't shoot the messenger
Taking into consideration the costs and profit affirmation, I think for GF it will be more profitable if close accounts get merged together since only then the merged people would actually spend the money for packs, in the current situation if I am having a 1b account and getting merged into a #1 200b server I would just stop wasting my money. But if I have a 70b acc and get merged into a #1 200b points server, then there is a true competition. In this spirit I think this might be a way better suggestion for the merges:
Group 1:
Exodus: 252 (Wurren), 253 (Xuange), 254 (Yin), 256 (Aries), 122 (Vega), 90 (Lacerta), 199 (Undae)
Targets: Universe 1, 198 (Thuban), 255 (Zodiac), 257 (Bharani)
Group 2:
Exodus: 258 (Ceres), 259 (Delphinus), 260 (Eris)
Targets: 255 (Zodiac), 257 (Bharani), 198 (Thuban), 261 (Fafnir)
+ Universe 1 x2 fleet speed increase and 50% DF
Like so you still have a wide variety of server to choose - x1, x2, x3 and x5 while still having the change to dodge the big whale servers
You can bring all the Street members in here to say that and few of the rest of the players and i think it won't happen ![]()
Should be considered but we are playing on wrong community.
Target unis:Vega(Lacerta),Uni1,Thuban.
Exodus: Lacerta(Vega) ,Yin.
Target younger unis(everyone else): x4 uni with 70% df,x8 eco. and x1 uni with 50 % df,x10 eco.
Younger unis should be excluded from the merge with big unis like those 3(Vega,uni1,Thuban).
Display MoreWell we always try to be consistent to not disappoint you, at least you get used too...
Now, seriously, we had several options, included with new universes that, everyone, including the team loves to have and offer to you, but unfortunately it wasn't possible.
Don't ask why, you already now the answer.
Volans, as a chaos universe cannot be considered for any plan, it's like the limbo.
I would love to bring better news that could please to you all, but no, we don't have.
You can hammer your keyboards, we always listen your words and for the next time, who knows we can bring something better.
Classic org bs i should say.Vega is dead for 2 years already and this merge wont help at all,what was needed is to merge Vega with Lacerta to make more active both unis, otherwise i don't see how this is helpful at all for any of them.
Smaller unis are basically sacrificed for sake of the merge, non sense to merge so small accounts for example Thuban where they will probably end up in vm most of the time and quit.Target unis aren't getting anything better and we are all going via unwanted scenario of global merge or all of us ending in uni1.
Prongs can you explain yourself a bit, because this isn't the first time org has totally wrong merge under you.We all can remember Quantum that was killed without any reason.