Posts by Patrick19940504

Sinoxa

Quote

hey man, i'm sorry to burst your bubble, but i'm sure that is illegal. The reason we are not able to change existing scripts WITHOUT HAVING THE CHANGES APPROVED is because of things like this that you are doing.

When I read this, I struggled. The account grew by cheating but did I want to stop playing over this? Then I realized that those are independent questions. So I deleted the cheater account, that was a no-brainer at that point.

And, separately, I decided not to create another one - IOW I decided against playing OGame. It is better that way.

I have added functioning date sorting:

insert this

$.fn.dataTable.moment( "DD-MM-YYYY HH:mm" );

before

$('#table1').dataTable({

insert

// @require https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/a…nt.js/2.8.4/moment.min.js

// @require https://cdn.datatables.net/plu…orting/datetime-moment.js

below one of the other "@require"

Max Age 1 day is apparently hard-coded. I changed it from 86400 to 4*86400 (4 days) like this:

That slowed the script down, so I added some speed-ups, you could add some of those changes, OddWH - at least the ones that reduce the number of document.querySelector() calls.

https://www.diffchecker.com/8SGqq0cF

There is this meme, also:

Diamond Shield Dome

German original | Google Translate

Huh, I cannot replicate what I said about OSimulate. Shame on me for not adding screenshots there, too, so we just have to assume that I was an idiot.

Quote

And this doesn't even take into account the explosion probability on every hit which the SC's would trigger.

SC fire before cruisers, don't they? So that shields are unaffected let alone the hull due to the 1% rule.

Given your excel simulations, shall I file a bug report? It does not make a difference that I perhaps was researching weapons tech at that time, does it? Please no!

NoMoreAngel I'm imitating OddWH in tagging you, I guess this is how it goes here.

I'd like to mark each "defless coords" in the spy report table using my "defless coords" list that I created with AntiGameReborn.

I have only tested my code, not used it, yet. I'd like to get green light.

Warsaalk

Another promised win taken from the attacker:

api: cr-de-1-75c2ef0f647396aa60ef08cde2df6ec623114c11

trashsim share link: https://trashsim.universeview.…7f-4157-a4d9-b70e4403919f

Alternatively here are screenshots: 7 cruisers vs 1 small shield dome [plus some transporters that I ignored]

I suppose one cannot give any advice beyond "add x% to your ships", right?

https://websim.speedsim.net/ agreed that 6 are not enough while 7 are.

and http://www.toolsforogame.com/b…dorbatalla.aspx?idi=en-us

https://osimulate.com/ said 7 cruisers give me a 30% chance to win while 8 give me 100%.

Tbh, I'd up it to 200 unless you rewrite the code. DE 50 had (probably gone now) 50 galaxies. It shows that there are some crazy people in the GF ;P, so be prepared.

Anyway, this script is very helpful, thanks!

@"Script tolerators":

Would it be allowed to calculate the resources that are on the planet "now" based on the mines/storage and time past since the report? (I could probably code it myself). I think you would have to "open" each report by hand for the script to read this info in, but it sounds worth it in the long term to me, as inactive players rarely upgrade their mines.

Also (way less importantly): I'd like to make it possible to increase the probe capacity to 1000000000 so that you can abuse the "one-click probe loot" feature: By attacking with 1 probe, you can quickly and cheaply test whether there are defenses on that planet.

It did not show G13 entries.

Fix:

this line:

GetUsersOptions.GalaxyShown = "1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10;11;12"; //Affiche toutes les galaxies

1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10;11;12

->

1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10;11;12;13;14;15;16;17;18;19;20;21;22;23;24;25;26;27;28;29;30;31;32;33;34;35;36;37;38;39;40;41;42;43;44;45;46;47;48;49;50