Posts by CornerTwist
-
-
-
Hello, I have 5 accounts to trade. I want to trade them for bigger acc, at least 15bn (10x eco)
#1 Andromeda.si - 5,7bn points (x10 eco)
- expo oriented acc
- huge inventory + packs
- some nice fleet
- astro item
#2 Himalia.us - 5,1bn points (x10 eco)
- pure mining acc
- all planets 300+ fields (without terra or items)
- nice def on all planets and moons
- huge inventory + packs
- astro item
#3 Leo.si - 4 - 470M points (x10 eco)
- expo orinted acc
- average invetory
- some bc and cr fleet
- astro item
#4 Season 2 - all achivements
#5 Season 3 - all achivements
Please, only serious offers.
-
Hello Lorovus
We started with porposals more than 4 months ago, there were pools, merge, another pools and I think, it is finnaly time to apply new settings

Is it possible to get is soon?
Kind regards,
CornerTwist -
-
Hello Lorovus
Thank you for the answer.
I assume, 10x eco will be activated automatically, like in many other communities. Don't forget to change research speed to x20. (If it is not tied to eco)
Kind regards
-
Hello Lorovus
Merges are over, we already discussed for changes, is it possible to have pools now? To remind what we proposed in this thread:
Eco speed: 8x -> 10x
Research speed: 16x -> 20x
Peacefull speed: 3x -> 4x
Deuterium consumption: 0.8 -> 0.5
In addition, other universes wanted some changes too:
Fornax:
Galaxy number: 9 -> 7
info: Server Settings Change Request
Leo:
Peacefull speed: x4 -> x8
info: Setting Change Request
Since there are these 3 servers left, I propose to delete/archive threads for other unis on forum, so only Andromeda, Fornax and Leo will stay.
Kind regards,
CornerTwist
-
Leo want to be a target uni. Andromeda don't want to merge. Also if Andromeda would want to merge, it should be a Target uni since it is very first one and there are most players and inactives.
Leo will vote for x8 peacefull, which don't suite for Andromeda's players.
-
Hello Lorovus
Thank you for the results. Since Andromeda will not be a part of merge, can we get pools for settings changes, like Nebohodec proposed?
- Eco speed: 8x to 10x
- Research speed: 16x to 20x
- Peacefull speed: 3x to 4x
- Deuterium consumption: 0.8 to 0.5
Kind regards,
-
The only logic solution would be the opposite way. Astro gets more expensive with every level with some potential factor
-
Agree with LukaNebo, I belive most of players in Andromeda don't want a merge since we are adapted to universe like it is, just a little push with eco x10 since it is a very late game already
-
Hello,
I agree with LukaNebo's suggestions. I would also like to add, that this is most active universe with most people, so it will be target universe in future for merging. With 10x eco, everybody will be able to join the server with this popular setting.
Kind regards
-
-
Hello Lorovus
Guy from Andromeda here. For some reason, I am not able to create new thread there, so I will put it here.
We (players in andromeda) received pool a bit unexpected. We saw that there is discussion going on for Leo, so in Andromeda we talked a bit.
Since our universe in oldest and most active, the improvement is slow, we would like to see setting change. The biggest change we want is changing eco from x8 to x10, so we can develop similar to Leo universe, which might merge with us in future.
We also spoke about peacefull fleet speed, but this is already added to pool.
So with changes that are on pool we suggest to increase:
Eco from x8 to x10.
I belive it will suit to every player in universe.
Kind regards, CornerTwist
-
Check the temperatures on slot 8. Temperatures stays same after merge (I don't know if this aplie to merging through graveyard). Maybe now you have planets on slot 8 with -120 °C, you won bingo

-
Setting changes are live, thank you for all effort Lorovus!
CornerTwist
-
Thanks for info!
-
Sure, when can we expect change?
-
I understand that 50% would be too drastic change.
My guess about deuterium consumption is, that players thought that bigger is better, not sure if all of them even understand what deuterium consumption means. Also maybe they are not familiar with english words.
If results of pools are final and can't be changed then ok.
At this point i would like to thank you in my name and name of universe, that you make changes possible

Best regards, Cornertwist
-
Hi Lorovus !
I saw the results, most of them are like expected, only deut consumption is little odd. Since i am in contact with most players (all of them wanted 50%, but it wasn't in pool...), i belive there were missunderstanding by players what exactly means 100% deut consumption. They probably thought that 100% is better than 70%. Could be deut 70% instead of 80%. We even wanted 50%, but wasn't possible to choose on pools, I belive we would like to have 50% and could it be possible to implement it even now?
Best regards, CornerTwist