Posts by SomeRandomGuy

I see profit here, maybe you should stop crying about being attacked in a WAR game

idk what y'all trying to get at, there are over 2k accs in vega, up until top 500 are "decent" accs, basing on a average online players 40-50 is just an average, having 280ish votes, seems to me that there are still lots of people who didnt vote, so having 280ish votes doesnt look like its a lot then

I like this idea of the catchup mechanic and I like how Godiva formulated it, I think its a very nice mechanic that could bring more life to ogame.

Having the expo cap raised would also be beneficial to a lot of starting players, looking at mmorpg UK ranking i think max cap should be at 500bn or 1tn points

Also Dreadnought I understand your point of view, but maybe we can solve this by making the boost only avaible for players who don't have inactive status?

Quote from Sazr

This seems like a reasonable suggestion.

Quote from SomeRandomGuy

Vote1: war x1/x2

Vote2: Deut in df yes(along with 60%) /no

Vote 3: consumption 0.7/0.5

I would add x10 eco, but I guess that's not allowed for .org.

Display More

Correct, at least for now its not an option, although IF it becomes avaiable, we won't have to wait for 6 months for a new official vote and we will be able to vote for it directly

We won't have to wait 6months in theory, yet if we consider how fast we get any response from GF in general, yes we'll be able to vote within 6 months, but could also take 2 years

Have you tried from browser?

Quote from bosne

Some big words towards Mortis,

I will remind all to check on the first page of this post and see what

the MAJORITY wants !

You can always have opinion,

but what I know for sure is that Mortis helped to clean this uni

from cheaters more than once, and very successfully...

Display More

Who is Mortis?

I will remind all to check Page 7 after my suggestion, which also includes what the majority wants and includes all favorites from page 1

Only thing im wondering is when Neotina said "shortly" how long she actually meant 🤔

Just make the accs that are set to deletion inactive accs and let them be farmed

Quote from BigPun

lets just settle for war speed x1 and everyone will be happy

In my suggestion you have the opportunity to vote for x1, along with the other 2 votes

Quote from Zielite

Every time the peaceful speed changes in a uni, the overnight fleetsave is fubar,

(especially x5 or higher). forced to vmode until another merger.

Hope you x6 guys will consider changing your vote.

That's why its removed in my suggestion, looks like most people agree with that,

Quote from The King of Kings

Quote from Supernoob

At this point, it is evident that finding a combo of settings that would make everyone happy is utterly impossible. Therefore, it would be better to shift the focus onto something that would make everyone equally UNHAPPY, so nobody will complain about unfair treatment.

One recurring theme is fleeters complaining about miners having it too easy, and miners complaining about fleeters for the same exact reason, in reverse. So let's make it hard for both and the quarrel will end.

Also, non-turtles complaining about turtles building too much defense, and turtles complaining about IPMs and deathstars overpowered against defense. Instead of trying to appease both parties, how about punishing them both?

You can't really complain about being too deep in the crap if everybody around you is immersed in the exact same level of crap.

Display More

peaceful x1

war speed x0.5

deut consumtion increase 1.25

eco x 8 - x 5

defence into debri.

debri field 20%

Display More

except for the 2 trolls above your message which would get no ones support and would never even go to a vote, maybe try your own uni see if you get some support there 😉

So, most people here are just trolling, my suggestion is to keep it simple and fair for everyone:

Vote1: war x1/x2

Vote2: Deut in df yes(along with 60%) /no

Vote 3: consumption 0.7/0.5

Feel free to add any peaceful changes to this but I think its fine as it is now, miners have it good already, only reason they want x1 war is because they want to make fleeters lives harder, but if you just FS properly this shouldn't be a problem, then also another benefit for miners is they might get x10 eco when its avaiable.

What cannot be is that miners already have all they want, and might even be possible to have their accs boosted by a x10eco, while forcing fleeters, which already have nothing, to make it worse for them.

Doing the vote like this, we give miners a chance to keep things as it is, or even mess up the life of fleeters, but fleeters also get a chance to get some kind of settings in their favour

So the vote vote should look as follows:

Vote1: war x1/x2/x4

Vote2: peaceful x2/x4/x8

Vote3: Deut in df yes/no and if yes it would then go with 60% deut in df

Vote 4: consumption 0.7/0.5

I dont think there is any other way we can vote for anything, and doing it like this it gives options to everyone

Edit: if its not possible to do a 3 way vote, then I suggest we dont vote for war and peaceful in the first place, and we stick with vote 3 and 4

Quote from Black Rock Shooter

Quote from Muad'Dib

I am guessing by votes for x1 nobody needs inactive farming . Or they havent realized that yet

Let's add probe storage and f*** them off.

Farm, I said farm

That's the best idea I've heard so far, supported 😂

Quote from ScolarVisari

Quote from TheOne

Quote from ScolarVisari

Here i got 2 new options that might give all playstyles a little boost?


Option 1;

2 war

4 holding

8 peaceful

50% debris

deut in debris

0.6 consunption

Why these settings?

No change in war speed

4x holding to perhaps make ninjas more likely to happend.

8x peaceful for more expos / sending resources around for the none fleeters.

50%+deut will slightly give more profit then 70% without deut.

-0.1 comsumption for less deutusages.

Option2;

1 war

2 holding

8 peaceful

60% debris

deut in debris

0.5 consumption

Why these settings?
1x war to give players more change to survive a hit
2x holding to perhaps make ninjas more likely against fleeters
8x peaceful for faster/more expos / sending resources around for the none fleeters.

60%+deut will give a huge boost in debris due lower warspeed.
0.5 is the lowest consumption possible because of lower warspeed.

Love to hear input

Display More

We need a vote between old setting and new proposed setting, not a group of settings, like you showed. A choice between group of settings won’t satisfy enough of us to bring any changes. Tweaks where it’s needed will work for the majority making Vega more attractive in the future.

We need a vote like bastard showed, which was intended, but presented in a messy manner at the start of this thread

One vote only between the old and the new option.

This way, all options have their chance to get through, or not, depending on the players demand.

vote 1

Debris 60% + deut in DF ON (the two options would be voted on together)

or
Debris 70% (current setting) and without adding deut into df

vote 2

Peaceful x6

or

Peaceful x4 (current setting)

Vote 3

Holding/war x1

or

Holding/war x2 (current setting)

Vote 4

0.5 consumption

or

0.7 consumption (current setting)

Neotinea i think we are ready

Fly safe

Display More

Oh my bad. i removed option 3 after spelllingchecks and such. TY for noticing. Option 3 would have been no changes at all... :') i will update

Display More

You guys are forgetting that people want x4 war as an option to vote aswell, this should not be forgotten, alongside with 80% + deut in df which is also not mentioned like in bastards suggestion, the rest is okay

I like the idea, either adding some items (+30, +50), or making them stackable, ill support either

Quote from IngloriusBastard

So people let we start this and finish soon is possible, to much talking here and hate.

My proposal is that we make pool for all and finish this already.

Here we see what all is mention, and changes that me personal would make.

If anything pass pass if not we are stuck where we are.

Thanks and good luck to all

First:

War speed:

1x

2x (current settings)

4x

Second:

Deuterium in DF:

yes

no (current settings)

Third:

Deuterium consumption:

50%

70% (current settings)

Fourth:

Debris Field:

80 %

70% (current settings)

Display More

I support the idea

War speed x4

Deut in df yes

Deut 50%

df 70% or 80%

Most importantly the Deut in df, you cant just take everything from fleeters and give it to miners, there needs to be at least some kind of balance here

Quote from Natural Selection

Trust should never be freely given away it needs to be earned. The ways of the Ninja are not understood by the Samurai due to their distinct roles and philosophies:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Sometimes the ways of the Ninja are not understood my anyone because he eats lead paint chip!

They dont have to understand, samurai like seppuku, maybe they are just being pushed in the right direction to do so

Quote from Muad'Dib

Quote from skeleton

Hello everyone ,
Ive been reading some posts here and laughing

Well for all people looking for a peaceful uni , maybe better to find another game !? I remember ogame was introduced as a war game , so no place for peace in a war game .
Its so simple , for all miners that only wants changes for their good without considering what is good for fleeters as well , i can assure that any upgrade for fleeting will not affect you if you FS well and play careful as you should do .

As for me , to be fair and to have a balanced uni , we already have 8x eco , so i suggest to have 8x for fleet as well

Cheers

Display More

Not bad lol +1. While we are it skip inactive and empty systems feature

Display More

If we are doing this, would you agree to a peaceful x6 too? I want my cargos to go faster, maybe in combination with 0.5 deut consumption?

Quote from Darth

Where I play or the status of my accounts is none of your concern, and it’s certainly not the topic of this thread. For the record, I’m active in Uni Vega alongside Lacerta, Imai, Lyra, and Mars. If your aim was to cry for attention, all you’ve done is make a fool of yourself.

However, let us assume you are right. Having an IG vote which could result in a change in settings could encourage more v-moders to come out and play actively. Perhaps learn to think before you speak, rather than parading your ignorance so proudly.

Wow didn't know you felt stepped on your toes so fast, its okay if you cant take a little joke, but really the one creating drama and acting like a spoiled kid trying to defend everything thats thrown at him is you

Only reason you want this vote is bcs you know you cant do anything, you play so many unis and this one suddenly you want to go hand in hand with mortis to try and make it a x1, only to piss other people off, doom is known for its toxicity, no wonder so many left after last merge, and specially for you, to keep it on topic, x1 speed, it won't happen

This will be my last message to you as it is useless talking to a wall

Having an acc in permanent vmode yeah sure, you only play on ur lacerta acc where you can feel safe lmao

Quote from Sazr

I don't think the community should have to argue for who gets x10 eco and who doesn't.

It doesn't make sense to keep both Vega and Lacerta as target universes, their settings are too similar. Whoever decided that both universes should be targets again, must also have the power to decide what universes should be targets when the next merge happens. That person should pick either Vega or Lacerta to be kept as a target for the next merge, and the other as an exodus. Then you give an x10eco vote to the two target servers, uni 1 and Vega or Lacerta.

Fantastic idea, lets get rid of Lacerta, vega has been around for much longer, and plenty of people in lacerta want acs ON maybe then darth will have a right to vote here then aswell ^^